Re: Glas Buzina: kolju civile i djecu nabadaju na kolce

by **kic** 14/12/2016, 23:05

još malo i nećeš imati s kim pričati..

by RayMabus 14/12/2016, 23:05

kic wrote:
još malo i nećeš imati s kim pričati..

by govinda 14/12/2016, 23:06

kic wrote:
još malo i nećeš imati s kim pričati..

pricacu sam sa sobom i znacu da pricam sa pametnom i inteligentnom osobom..ha ja...

by RayMabus 14/12/2016, 23:16

Takvo je doba , puno se ratuju , stradaju civili ....u nekom idealnom svijetu ratova nebi ni bilo ALI ovo nije idealan svijet ....i to je sve.

by michaellcmacha 14/12/2016, 23:19

RayMabus wrote:Takvo je doba , puno se ratuju , stradaju civili ....u nekom idealnom svijetu ratova nebi ni bilo ALI ovo nije idealan svijet ....i to je sve.

bio bi to i tamo svedeno na manju mjeru da je to cilj, međutim upravo u okviru ratnih djelovanja kojima svjedočimo činjenje teških zločinstava je opravdano željom da se spirala zla zavrti i da traje što duže....

by RayMabus 14/12/2016, 23:23

michaellcmacha wrote:
RayMabus wrote:Takvo je doba , puno se ratuju , stradaju civili ....u nekom idealnom svijetu ratova nebi ni bilo ALI ovo nije idealan svijet ....i to je sve.
bio bi to i tamo svedeno na manju mjeru da je to cilj, međutim upravo u okviru ratnih djelovanja kojima svjedočimo činjenje teških zločinstava je opravdano željom da se spirala zla zavrti i da traje što duže....

NIsam ja prava osoba za ove priče ...u nekim situacijama moraš spalit neki grad da bi ostatak društva preživo a za to nesmiješ imat nekakve moralne kočnice.

by **kic** 14/12/2016, 23:31

I divide my officers into four groups. There are clever, diligent, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and diligent — their place is the General Staff. The next lot are stupid and lazy — they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the intellectual clarity and the composure necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is stupid and diligent — he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always cause only mischief.
*
Chief of the Army High Command, Hammerstein-Equord.

by **kic** 14/12/2016, 23:31

In any specific action we always have the choice between the most audacious and the most careful solution. Some people think that the theory of war always advises the latter. That assumption is false. If the theory does advise anything, it is the nature of war to advise the most decisive, that is, the most audacious. Theory leaves it to the military leader, however, to act according to his own courage, according to the spirit of the enterprise and his self-confidence. Make your choice, therefore, according to this inner force; but never forget that no military leader has ever become great without audacity.
—CARL VON CLAUSEWITZ,
Die Grundsätze des Kriegführens
(PRINCIPLES OF WAR), 1812

by Guest 14/12/2016, 23:34

kic wrote:
još malo i nećeš imati s kim pričati..

ja nemam nikog, al zato neki imaju mene B-)

by **kic** 14/12/2016, 23:38

Noor wrote:
kic wrote:
još malo i nećeš imati s kim pričati..

ja nemam nikog, al zato neki imaju mene

žene uvijek imaju nekog santa

by govinda 14/12/2016, 23:41

kic wrote:
I divide my officers into four groups. There are clever, diligent, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and diligent — their place is the General Staff. The next lot are stupid and lazy — they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the intellectual clarity and the composure necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is stupid and diligent — he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always cause only mischief.
*
Chief of the Army High Command, Hammerstein-Equord.

Pricao mi je jedan moj drug iz Brckog o svom ratovanju u Iraku...radio je za neku zastitarsku firmu u Iraku (citaj bio placenik)..tako mi je govorio o americkim vojnicima koji platu trose kupujuci preko interneta rambo nozeve i pancirke, urezuju recke na kundake za svakog koga su ubili itd...o jednom Amerikanki koja je bila nisandzija na helikopterskom mitraljezu i rekla ovim placenicima ako necete da pucate po kucama bacam vas iz helikoptera...

by RayMabus 14/12/2016, 23:42

kic wrote:
In any specific action we always have the choice between the most audacious and the most careful solution. Some people think that the theory of war always advises the latter. That assumption is false. If the theory does advise anything, it is the nature of war to advise the most decisive, that is, the most audacious. Theory leaves it to the military leader, however, to act according to his own courage, according to the spirit of the enterprise and his self-confidence. Make your choice, therefore, according to this inner force; but never forget that no military leader has ever become great without audacity.
—CARL VON CLAUSEWITZ,
Die Grundsätze des Kriegführens
(PRINCIPLES OF WAR), 1812

Glas Buzina: kolju civile i djecu nabadaju na kolce - Page 4 Geti_124rf_kemijskooruzje

by Guest 14/12/2016, 23:42

kic wrote:
Noor wrote:
kic wrote:
još malo i nećeš imati s kim pričati..

ja nemam nikog, al zato neki imaju mene

žene uvijek imaju nekog

je, je...vi nemate kao :D
ako nemaš znači da nit ne vrijediš

by **kic** 14/12/2016, 23:44

Noor wrote:
kic wrote:
Noor wrote:
kic wrote:
još malo i nećeš imati s kim pričati..

ja nemam nikog, al zato neki imaju mene

žene uvijek imaju nekog

je, je...vi nemate kao :D
ako nemaš znači da nit ne vrijediš

zakon tržišta, ako ne valja drugima, ne valja ni meni :stalk

by darth_vader 14/12/2016, 23:45

Ma gasi glupi forum...svi na ignore listu...Kic prvi...

by **kic** 14/12/2016, 23:47

govinda wrote:
kic wrote:
I divide my officers into four groups. There are clever, diligent, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and diligent — their place is the General Staff. The next lot are stupid and lazy — they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the intellectual clarity and the composure necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is stupid and diligent — he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always cause only mischief.
*
Chief of the Army High Command, Hammerstein-Equord.
Pricao mi je jedan moj drug iz Brckog o svom ratovanju u Iraku...radio je za neku zastitarsku firmu u Iraku (citaj bio placenik)..tako mi je govorio o americkim vojnicima koji platu trose kupujuci preko interneta rambo nozeve i pancirke, urezuju recke na kundake za svakog koga su ubili itd...o jednom Amerikanki koja je bila nisandzija na helikopterskom mitraljezu i rekla ovim placenicima ako necete da pucate po kucama bacam vas iz helikoptera...

baš sam neki dan bio u American store, u sklopu British Empire, i tak gledam tu robu, uglavnom nije zamišljeno kao army shop, već svakakve punk, rock i sl moda, ali je završilo na preko 50% stvari: vojničke majice, hlače, jakne, obuća, pojasevi, i sva druga čuda opreme, noževa i sl..

i baš razmišljam kako su Ameri skroz u macho modu, Briti imaju neki legacy, ali nije više to to kod njih..

by RayMabus 14/12/2016, 23:47

RayMabus wrote:
kic wrote:
In any specific action we always have the choice between the most audacious and the most careful solution. Some people think that the theory of war always advises the latter. That assumption is false. If the theory does advise anything, it is the nature of war to advise the most decisive, that is, the most audacious. Theory leaves it to the military leader, however, to act according to his own courage, according to the spirit of the enterprise and his self-confidence. Make your choice, therefore, according to this inner force; but never forget that no military leader has ever become great without audacity.
—CARL VON CLAUSEWITZ,
Die Grundsätze des Kriegführens
(PRINCIPLES OF WAR), 1812

Moj izbor su bojni otrovi i to na nacin da tamo gdje to mislim nitko nepreživi.

Razlog : duša je besmrtna al traume ostaju i ako vec trebam deinkarnirati nešto a takva je situacija tj nemože drukčije ( a nisu mi osobno digli živce jer onda bi ih mučio i rezao i sve suprotno od ovoga ) ....deinkarnacija mora biti brza i trenutna tj da nebude traumatiziran događaj.

Netko to ( traume ) mora i čisti poslije a ......a taj netko sam opet ja.

by **kic** 14/12/2016, 23:48

jasambrend wrote:Ma gasi glupi forum...svi na ignore listu...Kic prvi...

mislim da se admina ne može stavit na ignore :grin

by govinda 14/12/2016, 23:50

kic wrote:
govinda wrote:
Pricao mi je jedan moj drug iz Brckog o svom ratovanju u Iraku...radio je za neku zastitarsku firmu u Iraku (citaj bio placenik)..tako mi je govorio o americkim vojnicima koji platu trose kupujuci preko interneta rambo nozeve i pancirke, urezuju recke na kundake za svakog koga su ubili itd...o jednom Amerikanki koja je bila nisandzija na helikopterskom mitraljezu i rekla ovim placenicima ako necete da pucate po kucama bacam vas iz helikoptera...

baš sam neki dan bio u American store, u sklopu British Empire, i tak gledam tu robu, uglavnom nije zamišljeno kao army shop, već svakakve punk, rock i sl moda, ali je završilo na preko 50% stvari: vojničke majice, hlače, jakne, obuća, pojasevi, i sva druga čuda opreme, noževa i sl..

i baš razmišljam kako su Ameri skroz u macho modu, Briti imaju neki legacy, ali nije više to to kod njih..

oni u bazama imaju shopove gdje je roba jeftinija, nema poreza i zamolim ja komsiju koji je radio u Kandaharu kao sef kuhinje da mi kupi jaknu, vijetnamku sa pustinjskim uzorkom, ni 50 dolara je u tim trgovinama..kaze ne moze, samo Amerikanci mogu kupovati u tim shopovima...tako da nis' od moje vijetnamke...

by **kic** 14/12/2016, 23:52

govinda wrote:
kic wrote:
govinda wrote:
Pricao mi je jedan moj drug iz Brckog o svom ratovanju u Iraku...radio je za neku zastitarsku firmu u Iraku (citaj bio placenik)..tako mi je govorio o americkim vojnicima koji platu trose kupujuci preko interneta rambo nozeve i pancirke, urezuju recke na kundake za svakog koga su ubili itd...o jednom Amerikanki koja je bila nisandzija na helikopterskom mitraljezu i rekla ovim placenicima ako necete da pucate po kucama bacam vas iz helikoptera...

baš sam neki dan bio u American store, u sklopu British Empire, i tak gledam tu robu, uglavnom nije zamišljeno kao army shop, već svakakve punk, rock i sl moda, ali je završilo na preko 50% stvari: vojničke majice, hlače, jakne, obuća, pojasevi, i sva druga čuda opreme, noževa i sl..

i baš razmišljam kako su Ameri skroz u macho modu, Briti imaju neki legacy, ali nije više to to kod njih..
oni u bazama imaju shopove gdje je roba jeftinija, nema poreza i zamolim ja komsiju koji je radio u Kandaharu kao sef kuhinje da mi kupi jaknu, vijetnamku sa pustinjskim uzorkom, ni 50 dolara je u tim trgovinama..kaze ne moze, samo Amerikanci mogu kupovati u tim shopovima...tako da nis' od moje vijetnamke...

danas se može sve naručiti online ionak..

by **kic** 14/12/2016, 23:53

spitfajerica majka..

by Sponsored content