Events
Publications
Latest imagesKissinger: NWO u opasnosti
Page 1 of 1
Kissinger: NWO u opasnosti
by Kermit Thu 3 Dec - 21:53
http://www.wsj.com/articles/henry-kissinger-on-the-assembly-of-a-new-world-order-1409328075
Kermit-
Posts : 26479
2014-04-17
Re: Kissinger: NWO u opasnosti
by Kermit Thu 3 Dec - 21:53
[size=40]Henry Kissinger on the Assembly of a New World Order
ENLARGE
The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis, writes Henry Kissinger. Above, a pro-Russian fighter stands guard at a checkpoint close to Donetsk, Ukraine in July. [size=11]EUROPEAN PRESSPHOTO AGENCY
By
HENRY KISSINGER
Updated Aug. 29, 2014 12:04 p.m. ET
Libya is in civil war, fundamentalist armies are building a self-declared caliphate across Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan's young democracy is on the verge of paralysis. To these troubles are added a resurgence of tensions with Russia and a relationship with China divided between pledges of cooperation and public recrimination. The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis.
The search for world order has long been defined almost exclusively by the concepts of Western societies. In the decades following World War II, the U.S.—strengthened in its economy and national confidence—began to take up the torch of international leadership and added a new dimension. A nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative governance, the U.S. identified its own rise with the spread of liberty and democracy and credited these forces with an ability to achieve just and lasting peace. The traditional European approach to order had viewed peoples and states as inherently competitive; to constrain the effects of their clashing ambitions, it relied on a balance of power and a concert of enlightened statesmen. The prevalent American view considered people inherently reasonable and inclined toward peaceful compromise and common sense; the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order. Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries.[/size]
The concept that has underpinned the modern geopolitical era is in crisis
[/size]ENLARGEThe concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis, writes Henry Kissinger. Above, a pro-Russian fighter stands guard at a checkpoint close to Donetsk, Ukraine in July. [size=11]EUROPEAN PRESSPHOTO AGENCY
By
HENRY KISSINGER
Updated Aug. 29, 2014 12:04 p.m. ET
Libya is in civil war, fundamentalist armies are building a self-declared caliphate across Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan's young democracy is on the verge of paralysis. To these troubles are added a resurgence of tensions with Russia and a relationship with China divided between pledges of cooperation and public recrimination. The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis.
The search for world order has long been defined almost exclusively by the concepts of Western societies. In the decades following World War II, the U.S.—strengthened in its economy and national confidence—began to take up the torch of international leadership and added a new dimension. A nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative governance, the U.S. identified its own rise with the spread of liberty and democracy and credited these forces with an ability to achieve just and lasting peace. The traditional European approach to order had viewed peoples and states as inherently competitive; to constrain the effects of their clashing ambitions, it relied on a balance of power and a concert of enlightened statesmen. The prevalent American view considered people inherently reasonable and inclined toward peaceful compromise and common sense; the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order. Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries.[/size]
Kermit-
Posts : 26479
2014-04-17
Re: Kissinger: NWO u opasnosti
by Kermit Thu 3 Dec - 21:53
This effort to establish world order has in many ways come to fruition. A plethora of independent sovereign states govern most of the world's territory. The spread of democracy and participatory governance has become a shared aspiration if not a universal reality; global communications and financial networks operate in real time.
The years from perhaps 1948 to the turn of the century marked a brief moment in human history when one could speak of an incipient global world order composed of an amalgam of American idealism and traditional European concepts of statehood and balance of power. But vast regions of the world have never shared and only acquiesced in the Western concept of order. These reservations are now becoming explicit, for example, in the Ukraine crisis and the South China Sea. The order established and proclaimed by the West stands at a turning point.
The years from perhaps 1948 to the turn of the century marked a brief moment in human history when one could speak of an incipient global world order composed of an amalgam of American idealism and traditional European concepts of statehood and balance of power. But vast regions of the world have never shared and only acquiesced in the Western concept of order. These reservations are now becoming explicit, for example, in the Ukraine crisis and the South China Sea. The order established and proclaimed by the West stands at a turning point.
Kermit-
Posts : 26479
2014-04-17
Re: Kissinger: NWO u opasnosti
by Kermit Thu 3 Dec - 21:53
irst, the nature of the state itself—the basic formal unit of international life—has been subjected to a multitude of pressures. Europe has set out to transcend the state and craft a foreign policy based primarily on the principles of soft power. But it is doubtful that claims to legitimacy separated from a concept of strategy can sustain a world order. And Europe has not yet given itself attributes of statehood, tempting a vacuum of authority internally and an imbalance of power along its borders. At the same time, parts of the Middle East have dissolved into sectarian and ethnic components in conflict with each other; religious militias and the powers backing them violate borders and sovereignty at will, producing the phenomenon of failed states not controlling their own territory.
Kermit-
Posts : 26479
2014-04-17
Re: Kissinger: NWO u opasnosti
by Kermit Thu 3 Dec - 21:53
The challenge in Asia is the opposite of Europe's: Balance-of-power principles prevail unrelated to an agreed concept of legitimacy, driving some disagreements to the edge of confrontation.
The clash between the international economy and the political institutions that ostensibly govern it also weakens the sense of common purpose necessary for world order. The economic system has become global, while the political structure of the world remains based on the nation-state. Economic globalization, in its essence, ignores national frontiers. Foreign policy affirms them, even as it seeks to reconcile conflicting national aims or ideals of world order.
This dynamic has produced decades of sustained economic growth punctuated by periodic financial crises of seemingly escalating intensity: in Latin America in the 1980s; in Asia in 1997; in Russia in 1998; in the U.S. in 2001 and again starting in 2007; in Europe after 2010. The winners have few reservations about the system. But the losers—such as those stuck in structural misdesigns, as has been the case with the European Union's southern tier—seek their remedies by solutions that negate, or at least obstruct, the functioning of the global economic system.
The international order thus faces a paradox: Its prosperity is dependent on the success of globalization, but the process produces a political reaction that often works counter to its aspirations.
The clash between the international economy and the political institutions that ostensibly govern it also weakens the sense of common purpose necessary for world order. The economic system has become global, while the political structure of the world remains based on the nation-state. Economic globalization, in its essence, ignores national frontiers. Foreign policy affirms them, even as it seeks to reconcile conflicting national aims or ideals of world order.
This dynamic has produced decades of sustained economic growth punctuated by periodic financial crises of seemingly escalating intensity: in Latin America in the 1980s; in Asia in 1997; in Russia in 1998; in the U.S. in 2001 and again starting in 2007; in Europe after 2010. The winners have few reservations about the system. But the losers—such as those stuck in structural misdesigns, as has been the case with the European Union's southern tier—seek their remedies by solutions that negate, or at least obstruct, the functioning of the global economic system.
The international order thus faces a paradox: Its prosperity is dependent on the success of globalization, but the process produces a political reaction that often works counter to its aspirations.
Kermit-
Posts : 26479
2014-04-17
Re: Kissinger: NWO u opasnosti
by Kermit Thu 3 Dec - 22:30
“The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of orderwithin the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another.”
Kermit-
Posts : 26479
2014-04-17
Re: Kissinger: NWO u opasnosti
by Kermit Thu 3 Dec - 22:31
This is not to say that the ultimate endgame of the new world order will result in victory. But the cold, hard, concrete evidence shows that internationalists do have a plan; they are implementing that plan systematically; and all major governments around the world are participating in that plan. This plan involves the inevitable collapse and reformation of America into a Third World enclave...
Kermit-
Posts : 26479
2014-04-17
Re: Kissinger: NWO u opasnosti
by marcus-t Thu 3 Dec - 22:36
To govno nikad crknut. Jel i on imao 5 transplatacija srca ko ono smeće Rockfeller?
marcus-t- Posts : 1720
2015-10-07
Re: Kissinger: NWO u opasnosti
by udba Thu 3 Dec - 23:34
Ima brezobraznih ljudi šta bi iljadu godina živili da se njija pita. Pazi mu prezime, da se kod nas neko zove "LjubimInženjera" ubilo bi ga na gej prajdu.marcus-t wrote:To govno nikad crknut. Jel i on imao 5 transplatacija srca ko ono smeće Rockfeller?
udba- Posts : 4945
2015-11-10
Similar topics» 100 by Henry Kissinger
» kissinger 2014 o Ukrajini: EU da, NATO ne.
» Kissinger: Rusiju moramo približiti Americi kako bi izolirali Kinu
» "Oni nisu opasni, oni su u opasnosti"
» Europa je u opasnosti (od europljana)
» kissinger 2014 o Ukrajini: EU da, NATO ne.
» Kissinger: Rusiju moramo približiti Americi kako bi izolirali Kinu
» "Oni nisu opasni, oni su u opasnosti"
» Europa je u opasnosti (od europljana)
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum