Ljudska rasa nije pala sa neba

http://www.filmsforaction.org/articles/have-you-heard-of-the-great-forgetting/

How The Great Forgetting Took Place

It began around 10,000 years ago when one culture in the Near East adopted a new way of life that humans had not tried before.

Yehudi wrote:http://www.omniology.com/IcaPeruDinoCeramicArt.html

Dinosaurs in Literature, Art & History

http://www.s8int.com/dinolit1.html

In 1973, during an interview with Erich von Däniken, Uschuya stated he had faked the stones that he had sold.^[3] In 1975 Uschuya and another farmer named Irma Gutierrez de Aparcana confirmed that they had forged the stones they gave to Cabrera by copying the images from comic books, text books and magazines.^[2] Later, Uschuya recanted the forging story during an interview with a German journalist, saying that he had claimed they were a hoax to avoid imprisonment for selling archaeological artifacts. In 1977, during the BBC documentary Pathway to the Gods, Uschuya produced an Ica stone with a dentist's drill and claimed to have produced a fake patina by baking the stone in cow dung.^[3] That same year, another BBC documentary was released with a skeptical analysis of Cabrera's stones, and the new-found attention to the phenomenon prompted Peruvian authorities to arrest Uschuya, as Peruvian law prohibits the sale of archaeological discoveries. Uschuya recanted his claim that he had found them and instead admitted they were hoaxes, saying "Making these stones is easier than farming the land." He engraved the stones using images in books and magazines as examples and knives, chisels and a dental drill.^[9] He also said that he had not made all the stones. He was not punished, and continued to sell similar stones to tourists as trinkets.^[3] The stones continued to be made and carved by other artists as forgeries of the original forgeries.

In his Encyclopedia of Dubious Archaeology: From Atlantis To The Walam Olum, archaeologist Ken Feder commented "The Ica Stones are not the most sophisticated of the archaeological hoaxes discussed in this book, but they certainly rank up there as the most preposterous."[