ex-iskon-pleme
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

SAD-e: Iran je kriv za napad 9/11!?!

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Go down

SAD-e: Iran je kriv za napad 9/11!?! - Page 2 Empty Re: SAD-e: Iran je kriv za napad 9/11!?!

Post by Kermit Fri 11 Mar - 10:32

hahaha a isti "sudac" je otklonio bilo kakvu odgovornost Saudijske vehabije za 9/11

[size=48]NY judge acquits KSA in 9/11 case, rules against Iran[/size]


Kermit

Posts : 26479
2014-04-17


Back to top Go down

SAD-e: Iran je kriv za napad 9/11!?! - Page 2 Empty Re: SAD-e: Iran je kriv za napad 9/11!?!

Post by Kermit Fri 11 Mar - 10:37

User login

Username: *
Password: *

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

[size]

Zero Hedge Reads

[/size]

  • Acting Man
  • Alt-Market
  • Bearish News
  • Benzinga
  • Boom Bust Blog
  • Capitalist Exploits
  • China Financial Markets
  • Chris Martenson's Blog
  • Contrary Investor
  • Credit Writedowns
  • Daneric's Elliott Waves
  • DealBook
  • Demonocracy
  • Dr. Housing Bubble
  • ETF Daily News
  • ETF Digest
  • First Rebuttal
  • ForexLive
  • Gains Pains & Capital
  • Global Economic Analysis
  • Hedge Accordingly
  • Implode-Explode
  • Investing Contrarian
  • Jesse's Cafe Americain
  • Liberty Blitzkrieg
  • Market Folly
  • Market Montage
  • Max Keiser
  • Minyanville
  • Mises Institute
  • Naked Capitalism
  • Of Two Minds
  • Oil Price
  • Peter Schiff
  • Rebooting Capitalism
  • Shanky's Tech Blog
  • Slope of Hope
  • SmartKnowledgeU Blog
  • StealthFlation
  • Stratfor
  • TF Metals Report
  • The Burning Platform
  • The Daily Crux
  • The Economic Populist
  • The Hammerstone Group
  • The Market Ticker
  • The Trader
  • The Vineyard Of The Saker
  • Themis Trading
  • Value Walk
  • Variant Perception
  • View From The Bridge
  • Wolf Street



Home
Missing Clinton E-Mail Claims Saudis Financed Benghazi Attacks

SAD-e: Iran je kriv za napad 9/11!?! - Page 2 Picture-5
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 03/09/2016 21:30 -0500



  • FOIA
     

  • national security
     

  • None
     

  • Saudi Arabia
     

  • Testimony
     

  • Transparency









in[size=11]Share
13
[/size]
 
Submitted by William Reynolds via Medium.com,
Something that has gone unnoticed in all the talk about the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails is the content of the original leak that started the entire investigation to begin with. In March of 2013, a Romanian hacker calling himself Guccifer hacked into the AOL account of Sidney Blumenthal and leaked to Russia Today four e-mails containing intelligence on Libya that Blumenthal sent to Hillary Clinton.
For those who haven’t been following this story, Sidney Blumenthal is a long time friend and adviser of the Clinton family who in an unofficial capacity sent many “intelligence memos” to Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State. Originally displayed on RT.com in Comic Sans font on a pink background with the letter “G” clumsily drawn as a watermark, no one took these leaked e-mails particularly seriously when they came out in 2013. Now, however, we can cross reference this leak with the e-mails the State Department released to the public.
The first three e-mails in the Russia Today leak from Blumenthal to Clinton all appear word for word in the State Department release. The first e-mail Clinton asks to have printed and she also forwards it to her deputy chief of staff, Jake Sullivan. The second e-mail Clinton describes as “useful insight” and forwards it to Jake Sullivan asking him to circulate it. The third e-mail is also forwarded to Jake Sullivan. The fourth e-mail is missing from the State Department record completely.
This missing e-mail from February 16, 2013 only exists in the original leak and states that French and Libyan intelligence agencies had evidence that the In Amenas and Benghazi attacks were funded by “Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia.” This seems like a rather outlandish claim on the surface, and as such was only reported by conspiracy types and fringe media outlets. Now, however, we have proof that the other three e-mails in the leak were real correspondence from Blumenthal to Clinton that she not only read, but thought highly enough of to send around to others in the State Department. Guccifer speaks English as a second language and most of his writing consists of rambling conspiracies, it’s unlikely he would be able to craft such a convincing fake intelligence briefing.This means we have an e-mail from a trusted Clinton adviser that claims the Saudis funded the Benghazi attack, and not only was this not followed up on, but there is not any record of this e-mail ever existing except for the Russia Today leak.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-09/missing-clinton-e-mail-claims-saudis-financed-benghazi-attacks

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Naravno Klintonica hahaha
Kermit
Kermit

Female
Posts : 26479
2014-04-17


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum