a čuj ovo govno

http://www.vecernji.hr/svijet/george-soros-theresa-may-nece-potrajati-a-donald-trump-je-diktator-koji-to-sam-zeli-biti-1143592

šejtan

Raspadajući zombi.

...pa s jedne strane on logicki postupa..zasto bi drugiam dozvolio da upravljaju svijetom,drzavama,vladama..kad on to moze sam...i zeli sam...normalno da se osjetio ugrozenim i da mu klizi moc iz ruku..sve u prilog tome govore njegove nervozne reakcije

..i mozda se u ovom slucaju moze posluziti plenkijevim rijecnikom..'zasto sam ja sve ove godine rmbacio,bogatio se,usavrsavao se da mi to tamo neki pokvare..e nece ici..'

Theresa May on Brexit: Then and now

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-38653681

Theresa May has said the UK will emerge from Brexit as a "great, global trading nation", becoming "safer, more secure and more prosperous".

But in April - before the EU referendum - the then home secretary gave a speech warning of the implications of a vote to leave the EU. Here's how some of the key quotes compare:

Leaving the single market

April 2016: "So, if we do vote to leave the European Union, we risk bringing the development of the single market to a halt, we risk a loss of investors and businesses to remaining EU member states driven by discriminatory EU policies, and we risk going backwards when it comes to international trade.

"But the big question is whether, in the event of Brexit, we would be able to negotiate a new free trade agreement with the EU and on what terms."

January 2017: "I respect the position taken by European leaders who have been clear about their position, just as I am clear about mine. So an important part of the new strategic partnership we seek with the EU will be the pursuit of the greatest possible access to the single market, on a fully reciprocal basis, through a comprehensive free trade agreement."

April 2016: "The reality is that we do not know on what terms we would win access to the single market. We do know that in a negotiation we would need to make concessions in order to access it, and those concessions could well be about accepting EU regulations, over which we would have no say, making financial contributions, just as we do now, accepting free movement rules, just as we do now, or quite possibly all three combined.

"It is not clear why other EU member states would give Britain a better deal than they themselves enjoy."

January 2017: "If we were excluded from accessing the single market, we would be free to change the basis of Britain's economic model.

"But for the EU, it would mean new barriers to trade with one of the biggest economies in the world. It would jeopardise investments in Britain by EU companies worth more than half a trillion pounds... and I do not believe that the EU's leaders will seriously tell German exporters, French farmers, Spanish fishermen, the young unemployed of the eurozone, and millions of others, that they want to make them poorer, just to punish Britain and make a political point."

International trade deals

April 2016: "It is tempting to look at developing countries' economies, with their high growth rates, and see them as an alternative to trade with Europe. But just look at the reality of our trading relationship with China - with its dumping policies, protective tariffs and industrial-scale industrial espionage. And look at the figures. We export more to Ireland than we do to China, almost twice as much to Belgium as we do to India, and nearly three times as much to Sweden as we do to Brazil. It is not realistic to think we could just replace European trade with these new markets."

"And while we could certainly negotiate our own trade agreements, there would be no guarantee that they would be on terms as good as those we enjoy now. There would also be a considerable opportunity cost given the need to replace the existing agreements - not least with the EU itself - that we would have torn up as a consequence of our departure."

January 2017: "We want to get out into the wider world, to trade and do business all around the globe. Countries including China, Brazil, and the Gulf States have already expressed their interest in striking trade deals with us."

Not reaching a deal

April 2016: "With no agreement, we know that WTO rules would oblige the EU to charge 10% tariffs on UK car exports, in line with the tariffs they impose on Japan and the United States. They would be required to do the same for all other goods upon which they impose tariffs. Not all of these tariffs are as high as 10%, but some are considerably higher."

January 2017: "And while I am confident that this scenario need never arise - while I am sure a positive agreement can be reached - I am equally clear that no deal for Britain is better than a bad deal for Britain.

"Because we would still be able to trade with Europe. We would be free to strike trade deals across the world. And we would have the freedom to set the competitive tax rates and embrace the policies that would attract the world's best companies and biggest investors to Britain."

Satanizam live...

epijev mecena :)

Stanojko wrote:Satanizam live...

nikako da crkne, ko deda pantelija

a okot koji iza sebe ostavlja gori od njega

gargamel0101 wrote:epijev mecena :)

Ček...ček... :)    Đerđov stipendist?

marcellus wrote:

Stanojko wrote:Satanizam live...

nikako da crkne, ko deda pantelija

a okot koji iza sebe ostavlja gori od njega

Pantelija je zategao ćebe na početku filma. Mislio si na Đeknu

dzango wrote:

marcellus wrote:

Stanojko wrote:Satanizam live...

nikako da crkne, ko deda pantelija

a okot koji iza sebe ostavlja gori od njega

Pantelija je zategao ćebe na početku filma. Mislio si na Đeknu

ne, na panteliju, kolko je imo 150 godina? Inače izvorno je Pantelija bio metafora Tita, samo je Šijan film maknuo kao prava komunjara iz sedamdesetih kad se događa knjiga u tridesete

marcellus wrote:

dzango wrote:

marcellus wrote:

Stanojko wrote:Satanizam live...

nikako da crkne, ko deda pantelija

a okot koji iza sebe ostavlja gori od njega

Pantelija je zategao ćebe na početku filma. Mislio si na Đeknu

ne, na panteliju, kolko je imo 150 godina? Inače izvorno je Pantelija bio metafora Tita, samo je Šijan film maknuo kao prava komunjara iz sedamdesetih kad se događa knjiga u tridesete

U tome i jeste kvaka. Kao poemriš vreme događanja i kao niko neće da se seti, Inače, pravi Pantelija je deda neke rodbine moje žene.

dzango wrote:

marcellus wrote:

dzango wrote:

marcellus wrote:

Stanojko wrote:Satanizam live...

nikako da crkne, ko deda pantelija

a okot koji iza sebe ostavlja gori od njega

Pantelija je zategao ćebe na početku filma. Mislio si na Đeknu

ne, na panteliju, kolko je imo 150 godina? Inače izvorno je Pantelija bio metafora Tita, samo je Šijan film maknuo kao prava komunjara iz sedamdesetih kad se događa knjiga u tridesete

U tome i jeste kvaka. Kao poemriš vreme događanja i kao niko neće da se seti, Inače, pravi Pantelija je deda neke rodbine moje žene.

koji pravi pantelija, postoji i pravi pantelija?

kofein wrote:

gargamel0101 wrote:epijev mecena :)

Ček...ček... :)    Đerđov stipendist?

Yup

marcellus wrote:

dzango wrote:

marcellus wrote:

dzango wrote:

marcellus wrote:

nikako da crkne, ko deda pantelija

a okot koji iza sebe ostavlja gori od njega

Pantelija je zategao ćebe na početku filma. Mislio si na Đeknu

ne, na panteliju, kolko je imo 150 godina? Inače izvorno je Pantelija bio metafora Tita, samo je Šijan film maknuo kao prava komunjara iz sedamdesetih kad se događa knjiga u tridesete

U tome i jeste kvaka. Kao poemriš vreme događanja i kao niko neće da se seti, Inače, pravi Pantelija je deda neke rodbine moje žene.

koji pravi pantelija, postoji i pravi pantelija?

Mislio sam na glumca.

a, to